Blog

Jumpstarting AI development can be tricky, but AI starter kits can provide the necessary launchpad. The article explores three main types: Frameworks offer a highly structured, guided approach suited for mature domains and consistency; Templates provide a standardized project setup with more flexibility, ideal for diverse projects with common delivery needs; and Examples offer simple, working code illustrations, best for quickly exploring new or rapidly changing areas like Generative AI. The key is choosing the right type based on your team's needs and the specific project context to build AI applications more efficiently.

AI is heading for an energy crisis, with data centers projected to consume as much electricity as France by 2027. Big Tech's current solution—building more power plants—is unsustainable. Real solutions lie in energy-efficient computing (like in-memory and analog) and shifting AI to edge devices. Without these, AI’s progress risks being bottlenecked by electricity limits.

This third article in the series on Distributed MLOps explores overcoming vendor lock-in by unifying AMD and NVIDIA GPUs in mixed clusters for distributed PyTorch training, all without requiring code rewrites: Mixing GPU Vendors: It demonstrates how to combine AWS g4ad (AMD) and g4dn (NVIDIA) instances, bridging ROCm and CUDA to avoid being tied to a single vendor. High-Performance Communication: It highlights the use of UCC and UCX to enable efficient operations like all_reduce and all_gather, ensuring smooth and synchronized training across diverse GPUs. Kubernetes Made Simple: How Kubernetes, enhanced by Volcano for gang scheduling, can orchestrate these workloads on heterogeneous GPU setups. Real-World Trade-Offs: While covering techniques like dynamic load balancing and gradient compression, it also notes challenges current limitations. Overall, the piece illustrates how integrating mixed hardware can maximize resource potential, delivering faster, scalable, and cost-effective machine learning training.

The article argues that despite advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), their limitations, such as knowledge cut-offs and the potential for hallucinations, necessitate the use of RAG. RAG addresses these limitations by combining the internal knowledge of LLMs (parametric memory) with external knowledge (non-parametric memory). The core of RAG involves a Retriever to fetch relevant information and a Generator to produce a response using this retrieved context. While traditionally fine-tuning focused on the generator, the original concept of RAG included end-to-end fine-tuning of both components, and fine-tuning embedding models is crucial for improving retrieval accuracy. The post also clarifies that long-context models do not negate the need for RAG, as retrieval helps focus the model on relevant information. Furthermore, the emergence of Agentic RAG extends RAG’s capabilities for more complex tasks by enabling multi-step retrieval and interaction with various tools. The choice between standard RAG and Agentic RAG depends on the complexity of the queries and the number of knowledge sources required. Ultimately, the article emphasizes that optimizing the entire RAG system, including fine-tuning the retriever, is key to its enduring relevance.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is currently the standard architecture to build AI chatbots. But it has one limitation that can lead to potentially disastrous consequences in the enterprise: the inability to provide role-based access control and information security. To make sure that sensitive or restricted information is not accidentally retrieved, it is very important to restrict information from going into a query’s context based on the user’s overall permission and sensitivity of the information. By integrating Realm’s secure connectors with ApertureDB’s graph-vector database engine, we deliver a scalable, real-time access control system ready for enterprise workloads.

Efficient GPU orchestration is crucial in MLOps to support the distributed training and serving of increasingly complex models.

The post critiques AI evaluation methods from a physicist's perspective, highlighting a troubling lack of scientific rigor compared to fields like physics. While physicists meticulously define success criteria before experiments (like CERN's specific statistical requirements for the Higgs boson), AI benchmarking suffers from three critical problems: Benchmarks are abandoned once models perform well, creating an endless cycle without measuring meaningful progress. With models training on vast internet data, benchmarks are likely contaminated, essentially giving open-book exams to models that have already seen the material. Current methods fail to properly measure generalization - whether models truly understand concepts versus memorizing patterns. The author proposes a "Standard Model of AI Evaluation" bringing together cognitive scientists, AI researchers, philosophers, and evaluation experts to create hypothesis-driven benchmarks rather than difficulty-driven ones. This framework would require pre-registered hypotheses, contamination prevention strategies, and clearly defined success criteria. The post concludes by asking whether systems potentially transforming society deserve evaluation standards at least as rigorous as those used for testing new particles.

Dataplex acts as the ultimate pantry organizer for your data ecosystem, ensuring clarity, freshness, and accessibility. Creating structured "lakes" and "zones" helps teams efficiently manage data assets, track lineage, and maintain rich metadata documentation. With Dataplex, your data kitchen stays tidy, making it easier to serve up accurate and actionable insights.